Judge dismisses X lawsuit accusing advertisers of an “illegal boycott.”
Elon Musk said it was “war” in 2024, as X filed its antitrust lawsuit against World Federation of Advertisers (WFA) members over their Global Alliance for Responsible Media (GARM) initiative. Now a judge has dismissed the case with prejudice, meaning it can’t be brought again: > …if facts existed that GARM operated at an X competitor’s behest to put X out of business or that GARM advertisers sought to unfairly exclu…
Visit SiteBlogstheverge.com
Vroom, vroom.theverge.com
Sonos speakers and soundbars are 25 percent off for existing customerstheverge.com
Australia gets Max just in time for The Last of Us season 2.theverge.com
Apple shareholders vote down proposal to get rid of the company’s DEI programs.theverge.com
OpenAI is rolling out a free version of its Advanced Voice mode.theverge.com
Power is out in Chile.theverge.com
Epic Games to lose Apple ID sign on for accountszdnet.com
BitTorrent site ordered to enable server logs, turn them over to MPAAarstechnica.com
Apple accused of misleading consumers with Apple Watch ‘carbon neutral’ claimstheverge.com
Apple countersues Epic Games on allegations of breaching App Store contractzdnet.com
Judge dismisses Samsung’s smart ring lawsuit against Ouratheverge.com
Google to pay $100 million to settle 14-year-old advertising lawsuittheverge.com
Judge temporarily saves the CFPBtheverge.com
Project Honey Pot springs $1 billion lawsuit on spammersarstechnica.com
Nokia wins another patent fight.theverge.com
Judge denies RIAA request to reconsider attorneys' fees awardarstechnica.com
Nike is facing a lawsuit from people who bought its NFTstheverge.com
Illegally fired FTC commissioners on fighting for their jobs backtheverge.com
Wii Homebrew Channel development shuts down over ‘stolen’ codetheverge.com
DSL providers get their day in court, ask for leased lines backarstechnica.com