arXiv:2605.26937v5 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Parametric knowledge in large language models (LLMs) is a cornerstone of their success, yet remains poorly understood. Existing knowledge benchmarks typically rely on predefined questions (e.g., "What is the birth date of M.L. King?"), evaluating only knowledge that benchmark designers explicitly choose to query, a problematic availability bias.
Recommended
Evaluating and improving AI agents for sequencing protocol understandingarXiv cs.AI
AtomTree: A Hierarchical Framework for State-Aware Embodied Instruction Following with LLMsarXiv cs.AI
AnyGoal: On World Model Generalization Beyond Expert RolloutsarXiv cs.AI
Reward-Adaptive Co-Evolution of Policy and RubricarXiv cs.AI
Multistep and Multivariate Time Series Explainability with GradientSHAP: A Wind Power Case StudyarXiv cs.AI
Ramanujan Challenge Results: AI-Assisted Evaluation Pipeline for Multi-Format ProofsarXiv cs.AI
10 best AI observability tools for monitoring and evaluating agents in 2026Mintlify
Lessons Swift Designer Chris Lattner Has Learned about LeadershipThenewstack
Unpacking sandbox startup latency: why started ≠ readyModal
How Ramp automated receipt processing with fine-tuned LLMsModal
Cerebras Breaks Exascale Record for Molecular Dynamics Simulations - CerebrasCerebras
How AI Assistants Can Decode GitHub Repos for UI WritersDocker
A prompt guide to get the most out of HeyGen's new Video AgentHeygen
Lies, damn lies, and benchmarksDeepgram
How Beyond Retro scaled its retail operations trainingSynthesia
Insurance Social Media Marketing: A Practical GuideHeygen
How to structure documentation for both AI and human readersMintlify
Configure the assistant - MintlifyMintlify
SuperGLUE: Understanding a Sticky Benchmark for LLMsDeepgram
ChatGPT: Putting the “AI” in “Plagiarism” worldwide?Deepgram
