arXiv:2610.37851v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Existing scientific-agent benchmarks rarely evaluate whether agents can reconstruct the exact molecular structures and generation workflows specified by sequencing protocols, a capability critical for analyzing customized sequencing assays.
Recommended
Beyond Questions: Evaluating the Stated Knowledge of LLMsarXiv cs.AI
Joint Latent Reasoning and Observation for Agentic Video UnderstandingarXiv cs.AI
Compact-Bench: Measuring What Context Compaction Costs Long-Horizon Coding AgentsarXiv cs.AI
Where You Inject Matters: The Trust Region Effect in LLM AgentsarXiv cs.AI
CauProphet: Teaching Agents to Develop Causal Cognition like HumansarXiv cs.AI
AgentDecept: Benchmarking Deceptive Behavior in Tool-Using LLM Agents under PressurearXiv cs.AI
10 best AI observability tools for monitoring and evaluating agents in 2026Mintlify
Pulumi Neo Now Supports AGENTS.mdPulumi
How to serve trillions of tokens for trillion-parameter coding agentsModal
Do AI Agents Need a Semantic Layer?Motherduck
Building a Remote MCP Server: OAuth, Tool Design & Lessons from 4,000+ AI Queries | MotherDuckMotherduck
Cerebras Systems Enables GPU-Impossible™ Long Sequence Lengths Improving Accuracy in NaturalCerebras
AGENTS.md outperforms skills in our agent evalsVercel
You can just ship agentsVercel
skill.md - MintlifyMintlify
Best Documentation Platforms for AI Agents in 2026Mintlify
6 tips every developer should know when using Cursor and Windsurf AIMintlify
Voice AI for Government: Speech-to-Text for Government MissionsDeepgram
From ASR to CSR: Why Conversation Changes EverythingDeepgram
Lies, damn lies, and benchmarksDeepgram
